Archive for November, 2006

Windows Refund Day

Friday, November 24th, 2006

It turns out that as a die-hard Linux user, there’s little more irritating than having to buy a new PC and a pre-installed Windows operating system when all you want is the computer to install Linux on. Why should one pay for a Microsoft operating system when you’re not going to use it?

It turns out that there is a clause in the Windows license [sic] that allows you to claim a refund on a pre-install provided that you can prove that you have wiped it from your sustem and that you return the install disks unused. That was quite hard to do, but nevertheless, some enterprising folk set up Windows Refund Day to encourage this to be done.

Modus operandi III

Tuesday, November 21st, 2006

In rather short shrift, we can now plainly see the trap laid for Novell to walk into. In response to Balmer’s statement that Linux is contaminated with M$ patents, Novell’s CEO has replied that that was not what the agreement was about. Oh yes it was, Mr. Hovsepian. Oh yes it was. And M$ have replied saying that they “respectfully take a different view” to Novell on the matter. No shit, Sherlock.
After all, what moron would agree to putting a patent agreement in place if it knew that there were no patents to sue over? Novell say that on top of the interoperability agreement, M$ specifically asked for a patent agreement. If Novell knew or believed that there was nothing that infringed, didn’t they even stop to wonder why M$ might want such an agreement? Why, to sully by implication, of course; and Novell took the bait. Assholes.

Modus operandi II

Friday, November 17th, 2006

In a follow-up to yesterday’s post, here’s a transcript of an interview with Steve “Monkey Boy” Balmer (CEO of M$) where he makes an oblique reference thus: “that product [Linux] uses our patented intellectual property”. Really? It does? If M$ could sue any distributer of Linux for patent violations, don’t you think they would have by now? After all, Linux is a cancer according to him. No, there are three reasons why M$ keeps spouting this rubbish: firstly, merely implying it keeps people uncertain and nervous, and stops them examining the reality of the situation; secondly, it provides deniability, being so vague; and thirdly, even if there were violations, as soon as M$ declared them, the Linux community would remove them – that’s the beauty of Open Source s/w, you can get at the code. I can’t decide whether to feel sorry for M$ as their strategy is so unfair, or angry for their repeated attempts to discredit others.

There is no such thing as perfectly secure technology

Friday, November 17th, 2006

In case any of you were remotely sceptical about the Government’s fabulous new plan to issue IDs along with passports, and more worryingly, add your biometric data to a National Register (which won’t be sold to anyone, oh no, honest), then you were right.

The Guardian, with a little help from a friend, has announced that it’s accessed and can copy the data stored on a standard UK passport chip using a cheap (174 UKP) reader. The article goes into some detail as to why this is important, and gives the Home Office it’s chance to answer concerns, so it’s worth a read.

Modus operandi

Thursday, November 16th, 2006

For many of us wondering about the recent Microsoft-Novell ‘patent’ deal and why M$ is so keen to suddenly get in bed with Free (FLOSS) Software, the sowing of FUD about the number of patent violations in Linux would seem to be enough. There is also the discord that Novell has wrought by joining with M$; they couldn’t possibly have thought the Open Source community would be pleased. The newswire today has reminded me that there’s a third reason that Steve Balmer might want to look as though he’s cosying up and being interoperable: €777.5M of them.

Two for two!

Friday, November 10th, 2006

I couldn’t resist posting this. After yesterday’s wonderful news that Don Rumsfeld had finally succumbed to the inevitable (Did he jump or was he pushed? I don’t care! :), today’s most worthy victim of common sense prevailing is the immensely arrogant John Bolton looks like he might be ditched too. Thank heavens. Yo might remember him as the ‘gentleman’ who tried to destroy the United Nations 60th anniversary accord on aid to developing countries, combating global warming and nuclear disarmament, by introducting 750 last-minute amendments of his own. Godd riddance, I say.

Concern over preserving Linux’s freedoms

Friday, November 10th, 2006

A recent agreement between Linux proponent Novell and Microsoft covering interoperability and cross-patenting, has got some open-source folk worried. Any kind of deal with M$, given it’s history, is naturally cause for concern, but the bottom line is that M$ can’t close off any code without violating the General Public License.

27/15 follows the Bonzos

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006

That cryptic title just about covers the last excellent 24 hours. Last night, we went and saw the 40th Anniversary tour of the magnificent Bonzo Dog Do Da Band. An evening of mayhem, music, and madness. Truly excellent renditions of “Urban Spaceman”, “Mr. Slater’s Parrot Says Hello”, “Mr. Apollo” and much more had the audience baying for more. Guest appearances by Phil Juptus and Ade Edmonson (who were clearly in seventh heaven) bolstered the band’s complement and added to the lunacy (picture Ade dressed as a parrot wandering into the audience squawking “Hello!”)

Another step in the right direction

Friday, November 3rd, 2006

This subject hasn’t raised it’s head since the EU software patent hoo-ha of a couple of years ago. The attempt by big business to get s/w patents incorporated into EU law in the same (damaging) way as the are in US law failed – thankfully – but that doesn’t mean it went away. There have been other moves afoot to sneak various bits through under the guise of other EU legislation; again, thankfully, nothing serious has made it.